Here today we have another great example of the way Midjourney treats some artists, so that the style doesn’t appear to be fake or generic. However, if it’s compared to the original art of the artist whose name we used in the benchmark, one can easily see that this is a what we call ‘fake-positive’. That’s the reason we check all the styles in Midlibrary with the original styles. Toshio Saeki (1945-2019) was a Japanese artist renowned for his unique and provocative style of illustration, often described as «ero-guro» (erotic grotesque). Saeki’s work combines elements of traditional Japanese ukiyo-e woodblock prints with surreal, often disturbing themes drawn from his vivid imagination. His art is characterized by its intricate detail, bold use of color, and fusion of eroticism, horror, and fantasy, creating a shockingly original visual universe that explores the darker aspects of human desire and psyche. Did you know? Toshio Saeki’s illustrations often depict scenes of a fantastical and macabre nature, challenging conventional norms and societal taboos. His groundbreaking approach to art has earned him a cult following both in Japan and internationally. The style in MIdjourney, though representing woodblock prints and generally Japanese style of art, totally misses the subject matter and the grotesque and contradictory nature of Toshio Saeki’s original work. It’s safe and not disturbing. We are not using the Midlibrary score here, as the style is consistent and doesn’t miss any of the prompts in our benchmark, at the same time missing completely the original artist’s work esthetics.
All samples are produced by Midlibrary team using Midjourney AI (if not stated otherwise). Naturally, they are not representative of real artists' works/real-world prototypes.
Ver. 2.9.1
♡
We do our best to keep this website running as smoothly as possible. However, stuff happens, and we thank you for letting us know!
We regularly publish new Midjourney Guides, compile new Style Tops, update the website, and have fun! Want to be the first to get Midlibrary news? Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss a thing!
Personal Libraries are available to our Patreon Community
Learn more about the benefits of supporting us by becoming Midlibrary Patron—and start your Personal Library ↗︎
You have just become a Patron, and cannot log in?
Please, allow our team some time (usually not more than 24 hours) to set up your Personal Library.
You may be using different emails for your Patreon and Discord accounts. If that is the case, please, send your Discord email to community@midlibrary.io.
If the issue perists, or you didn't get a response to your email, please, inform us via Bug Report form
We are currently updating the Personal Libraires' infrastructure
In the nearest future, it will allow you to access your Collections much quicker, add covers to them, tag the styles you save to quickly find them, and—most importantly—save your --sref (numerical) styles!
However, at the moment, logging in to your Library is unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience. If you are a Midlibrary Patron, please, check this Patreon post ↗︎ for Personal Libraries status updates.
To start creating Collections and save favorite styles:
Log in with Discord →Learn more about Personal Style Libraries, saving favorite styles, and organizing them into Collections.
Learn more about supporting Midlibrary and the benefits of joining our Patreon community →
Midlibrary Benchmark is a test comprised of nine standardized prompts designed to test how Midjounrey styles (AKA artistic styles, reference styles, or style modifiers) work with different subjects in a variety of contexts.
Depending on how a style manifested itself with each prompt, we add 1, 0.5, or 0 points to its total score.
The prompt produced a generic results with no unique style features: this test adds nothing (0) to the overall score.
This generation inherits more elements from the referenced style, but they are scarce and dilluted. Which adds 0.5 to the style's score.
In this case, the Midjourney style showed a distinct and unique result, well aligned with the style's real-world prototype. A firm 1.